That’s the only thing being collected says the NSA, just metadata. It’s not the “actual” data so there’s no need to worry. We’re not listening to every phone call or reading every e-mail just getting tiny, almost imperceptible bits of your data. Of course, I’m paraphrasing here for brevity. Regardless of your political views (left/right/indifferent) there is certainly reason enough to be concerned. Metadata is critical for managing and tracking information. It is the “key to the kingdom” as I indicated in a post here quite some time ago albeit in a much different context. However, when I heard this is what the government had said I started thinking about the various ways metadata could be used with potentially harmful results, intended or otherwise. I would venture to wager that the vast majority of people outside of high-tech don’t know what metadata is or the utility value it presents.

Example of TV metadata enabling rich/complex relationships
Some may know terms such as “poll data”, “raw data”, “ticker data”, and “Data” the dude from Star Trek Next Generation with the pasty complexion, but not metadata. Data about data? It is only within the past few years that we’ve started hearing more about metadata and its usefulness to Big Data and analytics that are all the rage. Take the massive amount of data being generated, ingest it to some behemoth data center and then churn on it with massive compute farms to glean hidden or unseen relationships and identify the “diamond in the rough” or the “bad guy out for no good” (NSA focuses on the latter). Continue reading →